Instructional Message Design: The Laws of Simplicity - Reduction
Maeda (2006) proposed ten (10) laws of simplicity
inform instructional design for online learning. The laws are listed
below:
Reduce: The
simplest way to achieve simplicity is through thoughtful reduction.
Organize:
Organization makes a system of many appear fewer.
Learn: Knowledge
makes everything simpler.
Differences:
Simplicity and complexity need each other.
Context: What
lies in the periphery of simplicity is definitely not peripheral.
Emotion: More
emotions are better than less.
Trust: In
simplicity we trust.
Failure: Some things can never be made simple.
Failure: Some things can never be made simple.
The one:
Simplicity is about subtracting the obvious, and adding the meaningful.
The laws of simplicity posit that multimedia messages should be designed in a way that is clear, well-organized, logical
and easily understood by the intended audience, as opposed to presenting and
designing information arbitrarily with great ambiguity.
Law 1: Reduce
In this week’s post, I’d like to focus particularly on the
first law which is the law of reduction. Maeda (2006) suggests making things as
simple as possible and removing unnecessary complexity. I am currently employed
at a university that is heavily influenced by the British education system, and
very often in the academic world there is the tendency to make things
unnecessarily complex/complicated…and I’m not sure exactly why that may be the
prevalent trend. This ranges from basic instructions to access or use a particular
service or platform to directions for finding a classroom on my campus, and
even in coursework instructions. It may be limited to my local university
contexts, but for some reason there tends to be the misconception that being
wordy, providing an abundance of information all at once and generally making
things seem complicated/complex is assimilated to being profound, learned or an
academic. But according to Maeda, effectiveness is not based on being unnecessarily
complex, but it is really based on keeping things as simple as possible. To
this end, Maeda proposes the following
continuum:
how simple can you
make it? ⇔ how
complex does it have to be?
If the goal of instruction is to ensure that the intended
audience/target group understands the message, shouldn’t that message be articulated
in a simple manner to reduce ambiguity and enhance accurate comprehension? #justmytwocents
Working as an eLearning Support Specialist, I encounter many
websites which include websites affiliated with my university, as well as my
Google applications etc. One thing that I find somewhat off-putting is the abundance of instructions when all I want is to access the site/feature😒😑😦. Very
often when I see overly complex instructions, I just close the window and find
simpler route/site/application.....some might see this as laziness, but I see it as trying to keep it simple for me to understand (simplicity and efficiency) 👀😊
The images below illustrate an educational site that
students have to navigate just to get to the affiliated Learning Management
System or LMS (see previous post on LMS). This can often be a long, pedantic
and in my opinion an unnecessarily complicated and inefficient process,
particularly for someone who just wants to access the LMS for a quick review of
something, or to submit a project....it's almost like a simple goal/task that has been made super complicated - unnecessarily😦😩 #why.
Accessing the LMS at a particular institution:
2.
A new window will appear. Insert your login
credentials to enter the site. Click on the MOODLE icon to access the campus’s LMS
(this tiny icon may be hard to find in such a complex/busy page).
3.
A new window will appear. Insert your login
credentials to enter the campus’s LMS (note, if it is your first time logging
in, you will automatically be prompted to change your password which will
require you to open/check your university email account)
A more efficient approach would be to simply direct users to
the specific site they would like to visit, and eliminate all the directions to
the other sites that they need to navigate before getting to the desired site –
in other words, eliminate the need to visit the first two sites below and
simply have students go directly to the third site/illustration. This is where
Maeda’s (2006) law of simplicity may be quite applicable, using the first law
of reduction to reduce the steps and/or sites to access the LMS to one single
step – to go straight to the campus’s LMS site and login.
In conclusion, Maeda’s (2006) law of simplicity regarding reduction can be
applied not just to educational instruction, but it may be applied to other
fields and aspects of life e.g. human/personal relationships. Sometimes you can
say a lot and increase efficiency by keeping it simple. Never complicate the
simple things in life.
Justin Z.
References:
References:
Maeda, J. (2006). The laws of simplicity.
Cambridge, MA: MIT
https://designopendata.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/lawsofsimplicity_johnmaeda.pdf



I like that you're thinking deeply about the communication that takes place in the online environment. It's important to think about when detailed instructions are useful and when they might just get in the way.
ReplyDelete